I declare war on modern western feminism.
I refuse to support a movement that's devolved into radicalism, that's completely confused a whole generation of women and that's debased a whole generation of men.
I refuse to support a movement that's seeded in socialism, that hates males, that makes women out to be victims, that polices our language, and that's based on emotions assumptions instead of logic.
How Feminism Betrayed Women
Sexism is an issue that becomes worse the more we talk about it. The dividing wall between men and women gets thicker with every mention of sexism. When we accuse everyone and everything of being sexist, we dilute the word, leaving it empty of meaning. We really need to start picking our battles.
Wolf whistles, ass slapping, & derogatory terms are annoying…but this is surface sexism. The worst type of sexism that exists in the west isn’t piggish. It’s a subtle. It’s a poison, sometime deliberate, but more often carried out by the unconscious mind. It usually doesn’t have intent behind it, it’s often a knee-jerk reaction. It’s the dismissive attitude. It’s the assumptions.
It’s when a guy doesn’t want to work with you before evaluating your ability. It’s when a guy does want to work with you before evaluating your ability. Personally, I find the latter more annoying. But good news. These knee jerk reactions dying out with every generation.
It’s the encouraged, systematic cultural sexism, reinforced by upbringing & religion that’s hard to get rid of. There are still countries in this world that equate women to cattle. There are still countries with ongoing genocide of females because they are seen as the less valuable sex. But I guess Rashida Manjoo forgot this when she recently claimed that Britain is the most sexist country in the world. *Link below
The former two (surface and subtle sexism) only require you to disassociate, ignore, or scoff. The latter (active sexism) requires a social renaissance.
There’s a pervasive irony that haunts me. There’s these three fields that have always been dominated by males but were sparked by females. Programming. The first programmer was Ada Lovelace, 1800’s. Science Fiction. First sci-fi book was Marry Shelly’s Frankenstein, 1800’s. And even this recent freedom movement, libertarianism, anarcho-capitalism, leizze-fare economics, all fall back on the Objectivist philosophy laid out by Ayn Rand. She of course drew from many older philosophies, but I hope you get the point I’m making.
So where are the ladies? I went to a bitcoin conference recently, which ties these three fields together quite nicely. Not many women around. Now why is this? I can accept the biological predisposition of disinterest to an extent. Statistically women do favor the social sciences vs. the hard sciences. Maybe Ada, Mary and Ayn were just very special women. Maybe me and those other 5 girls at the conference are just different. I don’t really buy that. But ok, say we are exceptions to the rule, there should be more exceptions. We wanted equal opportunity, we got it, but what are we really doing with it? These men are not holding us back, even if they wanted to they couldn’t; but most of them seem either happy or impartial to see women in these fields.
Have we got nobody left to blame? Are we are holding ourselves back? Has sexism grown into an excuse?
Remember how back in the 20’s Edward Bernays sold smoking cigarettes to women as a symbol of power and liberation? Well the Rockefeller Foundation & the CIA funded and sold us a new type of feminism, which like those cigarettes, is death. Because what they really sold us was Statism, and Statism is death. And this isn’t a conspiracy theory, their poster child, Gloria Steinem has admitted to it.
This feminism isn’t pure and humanitarian like what the original feminists wrote about. It’s not about empowering women. It’s not about acknowledging women as the rational human beings that we are, raising us to the same value level as men. It’s not a reaction to oppression. It’s about social control and money. The main reason they wanted to liberate women was because they were missing half of their tax cattle. Equality? Yeah, they wanted equality for us. They wanted women working the same shitty jobs, and the same long hours, so we could pay our dues to the State. Oh sweet liberation! I can stand side by side with my husband in a factory and slowly die while they milk me.
But it goes deeper than that. This was part of the new political investment. A new “micro-physics of power.” They were engineering docility.
Liberate the mothers out of the home, destroy the family unit, create a dependent welfare class, take the children, and program their minds so their bodies do what the State wants. Mary Wollstonecraft, one of the mothers of feminism, argued that the mental inequality between men and women was caused by lack of education. She said this made women essential, since we are the educators of our children. Today, we have betrayed this.
We grovel to the state for our rights. We grovel for handouts and social policy so that we can artificially feel equal to men. State granted equality is a comfortable simulation. Don’t subscribe to it. Ladies, We are as valuable as men. And if we want something, we should take it, instead of asking the State to take it for us.
True social change comes from accumulative individual action, not laws and social policy. Don’t we lose the essence of equality when it’s granted to us by people sitting around signing documents, deciding what’s best?
So there’s a great betrayal here….women were not liberated from dependence on their husbands, women were transferred to dependence on big brother.
"The System Isn't Broken, the System Never Worked"
Imagine that you're living in a voluntary society with no government. Everyday for you is a love affair with private property, the free-market, non-aggression, self-ownership, and true freedom. Trade and information flow like Lil Wayne's words. Now, you're at a bar, trying to enjoy yourself when you meet a statist. They have this unattainable, kooky idea of a different kind of society, a society with a large government. What kinds of questions would you ask them?
Who will create a nepotistic breeding ground for monopolies?
Who will start wars?
Who will cripple free market competition and set minimum wage laws that ultimately result in less people having work?
Who will create a bloated military complex that abuses resources and destroys land?
Who will take away economic incentives and pay people to stay poor?
Who will devalue our currency and get us into national debt?
Who will actively prevent people from helping each other?
Who will control what we eat and subsidize industries and companies that poison our food? – Monsanto
Who will poison our water with fluoride?
Who will deliberately cripple entire generations of minorities by introducing drugs into their neighborhoods, encouraging gang culture and throwing them in jail for smoking plants? – Do your own research, too much out there to cover with one link. Start with googling "CIA and Contras cocaine trafficking."
Who will imprison people for sharing links?
Who will actively try to censor and block information? -SOPA, CISPA, etc.
Who will spy on us?
Who break into homes and shoot family dogs?
Share this with you statist friends & subscribe to my channel
Please help keep my love affair with liberty alive! I’ve dedicated myself to freedom and strive to make the best content possible, but I still need to eat! Help me continue to change peoples’ minds, because the more minds we focus on freedom, the better our world will be. Please donate if you can-
(see top right of the page for paypal option)
Riff Raff is better at basketball.
Droppin' names? Tie.
Riff Raff eats fruits and vegetables better.
Spending? Big win for Obama.
Physical fitness, you be the witness
Riff Raff soars to victory
Both avert questions well
This basketball battle will not end.
You can make a second amendment argument. You can quote statistics. You can reference history. These arguments are relevant but unneeded. There is only one true "progun" argument. It is an absolute. It is unwavering and does not fall on its knees to circumstance. It is fundamental to all human beings.
You are alive. You have an inherent right to stay alive. A gun is a tool. You have the right to wield it to preserve your life when under threat.
It's not about gun rights, it's about the unquestionable right to yourself.
Interview with Jeff Berwick (The Dollar Vigilante) on Anarchast about my gun video, morsels of mother Russia, women in the freedom movement, and my inspiration.
Please help keep my love affair with liberty alive! I've dedicated myself to freedom and strive to make the best content possible, but I still need to eat! Help me continue to change peoples' minds, because the more minds we focus on freedom, the better our world will be. Please donate if you can-
(see top right of the page for paypal option)